LawFrameBeta
Smarter Contract Review Starts Here
LawFrame is an intelligent legal workspace designed for transactional attorneys.
For transactional attorneys
Every uploaded contract becomes a workspace.
LawFrame is an intelligent legal workspace designed for transactional attorneys. Identify key provisions, uncover potential risks, ask questions with citations, and generate drafting suggestions backed by the contract itself and your firm’s preferred language.
Whether you’re reviewing a purchase agreement, commercial lease, NDA, or services contract, the repetitive reading gets shorter while keeping attorneys firmly in control of every legal decision.
-
01
Upload
PDF, DOC, DOCX, or a ZIP of those files. The original is preserved.
-
02
Search
The agreement is searchable at Search Ready, while Clause Intelligence continues.
-
03
Review and ask
Findings, citations, and your firm’s standards — on the file in front of you.
-
04
Decide
Accept, modify, or reject. Nothing replaces source language until you do.
In the product
The work, from the uploaded file to the decision.
Open a capability to see the screen it lives on. These are the tools already in LawFrame — not a roadmap.
01 Review A first pass on the uploaded agreement.
Clause Intelligence reads each section and records a summary, strengths, potential improvements, and missing elements. Review uses the extracted text plus the agreement type, represented party, and firm standards you confirm. The original file stays intact.
- Search Ready lets you start while analysis is still running
- Findings are assistive — not firm policy, and not a legal conclusion
- Inferred metadata stays labeled until you confirm it
- 1 · Services
- 4 · Term
- 8 · Limitation of liability
- 9 · Indemnification
Risks / gaps
The cap does not carve out a confidentiality breach.
Strengths
Mutual cap, tied to fees paid in the prior twelve months.
Summary
Liability is capped. Confirm the exclusions before you rely on it.
02 Ask Answers grounded in the agreement, with citations.
Ask This Contract keeps a persistent thread on one agreement and cites the sections it used. Firm-wide Ask searches the contracts your firm has uploaded. When the paraphrase and the clause disagree, use the clause.
- Open a citation to read the underlying section
- Follow-ups stay on that same agreement
- Drafting a new agreement goes through a template and blueprints, not chat
Can either party terminate for convenience?
Yes. Section 4.2 lets either party terminate for convenience on thirty days’ written notice. Accrued fees survive termination.
§ 4.2 · Termination for conveniencePrefer the cited clause over this paraphrase.
Ask a follow-up about this agreement…
03 Draft Suggested wording you accept, modify, or reject.
The Drafting Workspace starts from firm precedent and Firm Knowledge. A suggestion never replaces uploaded language on its own. You Accept, Modify, or Reject.
- Align with Firm Standard, Strengthen for Client, and Respond to Opposing Counsel
- Client-side strategies wait until the matter names a represented party
- The suggestion lists the precedents that informed it
Suggested revision
Cap direct damages at fees paid in the prior twelve months, and carve out confidentiality and willful misconduct.
Does not replace the uploaded source until you decide.
04 Standards Firm Knowledge outranks the model.
Rate a clause from Preferred through Never Use and leave the note your colleagues actually need. Review and drafting treat that judgment as authoritative. When Firm Knowledge and AI Review disagree, Firm Knowledge wins.
- Preferred, Acceptable, Fallback, Avoid, and Never Use
- Notes stay on the clause — when to use it, and when to reject it
- Public Precedent is shared market language, separate from your standards
Limitation of liability · vendor form
★★★★★
Note
Use when representing the vendor. Reject a mutual cap that has no confidentiality carve-out.
When this disagrees with AI Review, Firm Knowledge wins.
05 Assemble Templates, facts, and blueprints — then a Word draft.
On a matter, confirm the facts, generate an outline from a document template, and assemble each section from a clause blueprint. Required facts are never filled in silently. Export the revision you approve.
- Setup, draft, review, and export stay on the matter
- Insert language from the Clause Library when the firm already trusts it
- Unfinished drafts keep unresolved placeholders visible
- PartiesReady
- ServicesReady
- FeesNeeds review
- TermFact missing
- LiabilityFrom blueprint
Required facts are not filled in silently. Export is a clean Word draft.
How decisions are made
Keeping attorneys firmly in control.
The model assists. It does not apply language, rank your clauses, or replace professional judgment.
-
The source is not overwritten
Accepting a suggestion creates a working revision. The uploaded file remains the source.
-
Citations you can open
Ask answers point at clause text. A confidence score is a model estimate, not certainty.
-
Your standards outrank the model
When Firm Knowledge and AI Review disagree, Firm Knowledge wins for ranking and drafting.
-
Firm files stay in the firm
Private contracts stay inside your firm. Uploads are scanned before they can be opened or downloaded. Public Precedent is labeled as shared public material.
Agreements already in the taxonomy
The documents transactional work actually opens.
- NDAs
- MSAs
- SaaS agreements
- Software licenses
- Services agreements
- Purchase agreements
- Commercial leases
Beta
Open the workspace.
Sign in to review an agreement, ask it a question, or continue a matter. Attorney review is required before you rely on any AI output.
Not in the beta yet? Tell us about your firm and we will reach out if it is a fit.